Re: Dinosaur counts

[Dinogeorge@aol.com]

In a message dated 96-01-15 12:32:47 EST, swf@ElSegundoCA.ATTGIS.COM (Stan
Friesen) writes:

> From: paleo@ix.netcom.com (Glen J. Kuban )
> >      Anyway, since I monitor the C/E controversy and may write on this 
> > someday, I thought I would ask here: What does the 775 general count 
> > recently posted represent?  Is that the number of genera ever 
> > named/published?
>
>Pretty much, yes.
>
>

All genera that have ever been referred to Dinosauria or any of its
subgroups. There may be a couple of pareiasaur genera missing, relics of the
brief time during the 19th century when Pareiasauria was incorrectly referred
to Dinosauria. If I come across such genera, I'll issue the usual
corrections.