[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Mesozoic-ware



>
>   I'm still in the process of switching from Linneanism to cladistics.  As
>I recally, amniotes are characterized by an egg with a fluid filled
>(amniotic) sack.  Would this not, then, include amphibians?  I am assuming
>that the choice of "amniota" in cladistics has a similar connotation, even
>though it's based on descent rather than physical characteristics.
>

No, because a true amniotic egg, with (more or less) waterproof shell, is
unknown in living amphibia.  Of course, who knows what fossil amphibians
had?  This is one of the problems with using characters like this one (which
is why mammals are defined by the jaw articulation, not by the presence of
fur or mammary glands or other things whose presence normally cannot be
determined in fossils.
--
Ronald I. Orenstein                           Phone: (905) 820-7886 (home)
International Wildlife Coalition              Fax/Modem: (905) 569-0116 (home)
Home: 1825 Shady Creek Court                  Messages: (416) 368-4661
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5L 3W2          Internet: ornstn@inforamp.net
Office: 130 Adelaide Street W., Suite 1940    
Toronto, Ontario Canada M5H 3P5