[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Dino Notes

In a message dated 96-01-09 07:30:11 EST, dino@revelation.unomaha.edu (John
Schneiderman) writes:

>Wasn't Dravidosaurus recently determined not to be a dinosaur?
>I think it was announced by Sankar Chatterjee in 1995.
>
>

So far, it's just a pers. comm. to me. And I think he's right. I've never
been able to reconcile the photos in the _Dravidosaurus_ paper with true
stegosaur remains, and the single associated tooth might be ankylosaurian
rather than stegosaurian.