[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Afrovenator abakensis
> _Dryptosaurus aquilunguis_ does have the large thumb ungual, and the
>referred metatarsal and humerus look much like a megalosaur's, so it might
>be a torvosaurid, despite its appearance in the latest Cretaceous.
Dryptosaurus is clearly coelurosaurian, especially when tibial and
metatarsal material is taken into account. Look forward to a multiauthored
paper on Dryptosaurus coming soon to the JVP.
> I noticed that tetanurans (from torvosaurs on up) tend to have
>opisthocoelous cervical vertebrae. Can anyone corroborate this? The
>only exceptions I've found are _Gasosaurus_ and _Kaijiangosaurus_. The
>rest of the bones look tetanuran, but they have platycoelous cervicals.
>Perhaps they are more primitive than the rest? Are there any cervicals
>referred to _Megalosaurus_?
Many coelurosaurs lack opisthocoelous cervicals, but yes, many of the
megalosauroids and carnosaurs do.
> In general, I agree with Sereno's assessment. Apart from _Gasosaurus_
>and _Kaijiangosaurus_ (which might just pertain to the same species),
(As is, probably, "Szechuanosaurus" zigongensis)
>tetanurans appear to fall into three groups:
>
>Tetanurae
> _Gasosaurus_/_Kaijiangosaurus_
Indeed! Did you see my SVP talk?
> Torvosauria
> Eustreptospondylidae
> Torvosauridae
> ?Spinosauridae (?incl. _Baryonyx_)
The presence of Megalosaurus bucklandi in here changes "Torvosauridae" to
"Megalosauridae", but I agree with this grouping.
> Allosauria
> Sinraptoridae
> Piatnitzkysaurinae (_Piatnitzkysaurus_, _Iliosuchus_,
> _Stokesosaurus_)
> Sinraptorinae
> Monolophosaurinae (_Monolophosaurus_, _Cryolophosaurus_)
> Allosauridae
> Carcharodontosauridae
I'm not too keen on the Piatnitzkysaurinae, and (in my analyses, at least)
Monolophosaurus falls outside the Sinraptorid+Allosaurid clade, but I agree
with most of this. Also, I have gone back to using "Carnosauria" for this
clade (Allosaurus and all theropods closer to Allosaurus than to birds).
> Coelurosauria
>
> BTW, what is the current consensus (ha, ha) on
>_Chilantaisaurus_--torvosaur or allosaur? Does _C. maortuensis_ belong
>to this genus?
Personally, I'd answer "allosauroid, tentatively" and "no strong evidence to
unite the two".
> I'm also not quite sure where _Megalosaurus_, _Magnosaurus_, and
>_Kelmayisaurus_ might belong.
I haven't gotten around to dealing with the latter two yet.
Take care,
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Vertebrate Paleontologist
Dept. of Geology
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742
Email:Thomas_R_HOLTZ@umail.umd.edu (th81)
Fax: 301-314-9661
Phone:301-405-4084