[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: linguistic analogy
At 05:22 PM 2/11/96 -0500, Rob Meyerson wrote:
>One possible problem with this, is the breastbone seen in all bird species, but
>not seen in any dinosaur (including Archy). It is possible that this feature
>succeeds in marking birds as "different enough" to place in their own category?
It's my understanding that many dinosaurs have deep sternums. The
sternum of _Mononykus_ is referred to as "keeled," as is that of
_Archaeopteryx bavarica_. The only difference is that modern birds have a
HUGE sternum, whereas in certain theropods it was merely large. Can a size
difference be sufficient to mark something as "different enough" for its own
category?
** Jeff's Dinosaur Page. Home of THE DINOSTORE ** "Those who trade a **
** (for all your Dinosaur product needs), ** little freedom for a **
** Jeff's Journal of Dinosaur Paleontology, ** little security will soon **
** and The Dinosaur Mailing List Encyclopedia. ** find they have none of **
** http://www.infinet.com/~jpoling/ ** either." -- Jeff Poling **