[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Quo vadis, T. rex? [long]

To: Multiple recipients of list <dinosaur@lepomis.psych.upenn.edu>
Subject: Re: Quo vadis, T. rex? [long]
From: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 1996 03:15:37 -0500
Reply-to: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Sender: dinosaur@lepomis.psych.upenn.edu

In a message dated 96-02-09 01:56:30 EST, pharrinj@PLU.edu (Nicholas J.
Pharris) writes:

>But there is no ancestor-descendant relation between a parataxon and a 
>"daughter taxon."  The latter is simply a part of the diversity of the 
>former.  Do you get what I'm saying here?
>
>

Certainly there is. And indeed it is part of the diversity of the former. Do
you get what I'm saying here?

Prev by Date: Re: Dino feathers=Ptero fur?
Next by Date: Re: infuriating taxonomic discussion
Previous by thread: Re: Quo vadis, T. rex? [long]
Next by thread: Re: Quo vadis, T. rex? [long]
Indexes: