[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Taxonomic levels in birds
In a message dated 96-02-04 10:18:38 EST, ornstn@inforamp.net (Ronald
Orenstein) writes:
>I think that there is a practical issue that debates on what birds "are" on
>this list have ignored. This is the effect of trying to force an
>evolutionary tree, however derived, into the LInnaean system (or vice
>versa). Doing so creates a practical problem that will differ depending on
>your specialty.
The archosaurian taxonomy presented in _Mesozoic Meanderings_ #2 wraps the
Linnaean taxa around a reasonable cladogram of dinosaurs and birds and leaves
all the extant orders intact within avian superorder Avialae. Taxa prefixed
with "para" are paraphyletic; if you insist on all monophyletic taxa, then
you have to ditch the Linnaean ranks.
Class Archosauria
Parasubclass Thecodontia
Paraorder Proterosuchia
Order Proterochampsia
Order Ornithosuchia
Order Parasuchia
Order Aetosauria
Paraorder Pseudosuchia
Suborder Prestosuchia
Parasuborder Rauisuchia
Parasuborder Poposauria
Order Crocodylia
(lots of [para]suborders)
Subclass Pterosauria
Order Sharovipterygia
Paraorder Rhamphorhynchoidia
Order Pterodactyloidia
Subclass Dinosauria
Infraclass Phytodinosauria
Parasuperorder Sauropodomorpha
Order Brontosauria
Suborder Sauropoda
Suborder Prosauropoda
Order Segnosauria
Superorder Ornithischia
Paraorder Lesothosauria
Order Ankylosauria
Order Stegosauria
Paraorder Heterodontosauria
Suborder Euheterodontosauria
Suborder Pachycephalosauria
Order Ceratopia
Order Ornithopoda
Parasuborder Hypsilophodontia
Suborder Iguanodontia
Infraclass Aves
Parasuperorder Theropodomorpha
Order Basitheropoda
Order Lagosuchia
Order Herrerasauria
Paraorder Theropoda
(12 suborders)
Superorder Avialae
(all birds from at least Hesperornis to extant)
I hope I haven't left anything out...