[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Warm- vs. Cold-blooded Dinos
Forgive a rank amateur and list newbie for just jumping in to the
debate but is so good I couldn't resist.
Intuitively I believe almost all the dinosaurs were warm-blooded for
several reasons:
While the climate of the time may have been milder than it is today,
there were still polar regions and mountains. These regions would
have quickly been dominated by warm-blooded animals. These active
animals would then begin to spread into the warm regions where their
increased activity levels would allow them to establish themselves
and, as we see in the fossil record and around us today, dominate
there too. The success of the dinos argues for this. I don't
remember hearing of any increased numbers of mammals in the polar
areas. If the dinos didn't do it the mammals would have.
The other argument is the dino tail. Holding a large tail off the
ground for long period is an enormous energy drain. Even if the
dinos were active for only short periods each day (like reptiles)
they would have had to generate large amounts of sustained energy
output to hunt or forage. I can't imagine a reptile making that kind
of energy trade-off, only a bird or mammal.
Alan
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Alan Geralnick U.S. Army Topographic Engineering Center
Phone: 703-355-3189 ATTN: CETEC-OD-DT
Fax: 703-355-3176 7701 Telegraph Road
Email: alang@tec.army.mil Alexandria, VA 22315-3864
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Standard Disclaimer: Just My $0.02 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------