[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Rank taxonomy (was Re: Cladism (akin to masochism))
>>I'm not sure if the above is very coherent (its very late and I should be in
>>bed), so I'll give an example of your dinosaur (throwing in one or two extra
>>nodes).
>>
>> Node No Name Parent No
>> 1 Dinosauria NULL
>> 2 Saurischia 1
>> 3 Ornithaschia 1
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Oh no, another name change!!!!
No, a typo.
>> 6 Tetanurae 4
>> 7 Coelurosauria 6
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Anybody wanna guess why _the Dinosauria_ lists no species for the
>Coelurosauria except those that are Theropoda incertae sedis? Am I missing
>a clade somewhere?
Coelurosauria gets a brief mention in Osmolska's intro to the Theropoda.
All of the following chapters talk about true coelurosaurs:
Ornithomimosauria; Oviraptoridae; Elmisauridae; Troodontidae; and
Dromaeosauridae. Some of the taxa in both Problemetic theropod chapters
are coelurosaurs.
And, coelurosaurs are such a diverse group, they require individual
chapters for each subgroup (just as the Ornithopoda got several chapters,
and not just one).
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. Phone: 703-648-5280
Vertebrate Paleontologist Fax: 703-648-5420
tholtz@geochange.er.usgs.gov ------------> th81@umail.umd.edu
U.S. Geological Survey -------------> University of Maryland
Branch of Paleontology & Stratigraphy ----> Department of Geology
MS 970 National Center
Reston, VA 22092 -------------> College Park, MD 20742
U.S.A.