[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Cladograms (long)
Having seen the cladograms you've posted, I'd suggest checking out any book
on phylogenetic systematics (aka cladistics) from a local college library.
You violate a basic tenent of cladistics: some of your "clades" are
explicitly monophyletic. Let's take the first one:
>fig. A
> Diapsida (see fig. B)
> /
> Amniotea(
> / \
> Tetrapoda( "Andiapsida" (see fig. C)
> / \
> Verte-( Amphibia
> / brata \
>Chordata( "Pisces"
> \
> "Protochordata"
[Actually, you've reconstructed the style of phylogeny used by Ernst
Haeckel in the late 19th century.]
Here's a standard version:
Diapsida
/
Sauropsida (Reptilia)
/ \
/ Anapsida
/
Amniota(
/ \
/ \
/ Synapsida (Mammalia)
Tetrapoda(
\
\
\
Lissamphibia
Or, in outline "shorthand":
Tetrapoda
Lissamphibia
Amniota
Synapsida (crown group Mammalia)
Sauropsida (crown group Reptilia)
Anapsida
Diapsida
Your "Andiapsida" includes anapsids (turtles & extinct kin) and synapsids
(mammals & extinct kin) - a non-monophyletic group.
Similarly, "Pisces" has been long abandoned by vertebrate systemicists,
since it includes hagfish and lampreys (outgroups to jawed vertebrates),
sharks, skates & rays (outgroups to bony vertebrates), and the bony
vertebates exclusive of the tetrapods.
In a cladogram, all the end units must be monophyletic.
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. Phone: 703-648-5280
Vertebrate Paleontologist Fax: 703-648-5420
tholtz@geochange.er.usgs.gov ------------> th81@umail.umd.edu
U.S. Geological Survey -------------> University of Maryland
Branch of Paleontology & Stratigraphy ----> Department of Geology
MS 970 National Center
Reston, VA 22092 -------------> College Park, MD 20742
U.S.A.