[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Re: bcf vs. badd

To: Multiple recipients of list <dinosaur@lepomis.psych.upenn.edu>
Subject: Re: Re: bcf vs. badd
From: Thomas_R_HOLTZ@umail.umd.edu (th81)
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 1995 11:30:57 -0500
Reply-to: Thomas_R_HOLTZ@umail.umd.edu
Sender: dinosaur@lepomis.psych.upenn.edu

>    >  Well.  How about this:  since these proto-birds were probably 
>    > carnivorous
>    Faunivorous. Did I get that right, Tom?

Right, although I consider true carnivory (vertebrate flesh) to be the
ancestral condition in birds.

Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Vertebrate Paleontologist
Dept. of Geology
University of Maryland
College Park, MD  20742
Email:Thomas_R_HOLTZ@umail.umd.edu (th81)
Fax: 301-314-9661
Phone:301-405-4084

Prev by Date: Re: Re: BADD BCF
Next by Date: Re: BCF in perspective (LONG!)
Previous by thread: Re: bcf vs. badd
Next by thread: Re: bcf vs. badd
Indexes: