[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: E-mail suggestions

To: Dino-Net <dinosaur@lepomis.psych.upenn.edu>
Subject: Re: E-mail suggestions
From: Tracy Monaghan <monaghan@cac.washington.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 May 1994 09:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-reply-to: <199405101611.AA17496@elvis.med.Virginia.EDU>
Reply-to: Tracy Monaghan <monaghan@cac.washington.edu>
Sender: Tracy Monaghan <monaghan@cac.washington.edu>

How much trouble would it be to set it up the other way for a short 
period?  After a week or a month, you/we could access the 
damage/trouble/advantage, if any.  

Personally, though I rarely have anything constructive to add to these 
discussions, I feel the default Reply-To: should be the list and the 
From: field should be the author/sender.

My US$.02 (before taxes) worth.


Tracy                         |   On the Information Superhighway
monaghan@cac.washington.edu   |   I'm just a bug on a high-tech windshield
Information Highway Worker    |                      --  Emmett Watson

References:
- Re: E-mail suggestions
  - From: "Steven D. Majewski" <sdm7g@elvis.med.virginia.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: E-mail suggestion
Next by Date: E-mail Headers for replies
Previous by thread: Re: E-mail suggestions
Next by thread: E-mail Headers for replies
Indexes: