Site update

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

I finally got around to making the site more social-media friendly. You should now have the ability to easily share posts on all the major social media services.

I also fixed a bug in the CSS that kept the font colour for the author fill-in fields black. My apologies to everyone who has been commenting in spite of the problem. I was not aware of it until recently. I also wasn’t aware that you could not subscribe to comments, so I fixed that problem too. You can now subscribe to posts with or without commenting. You can also receive notifications for just replies to your comments if that is what you prefer.

Hopefully the site is a bit more user friendly now. Let me know if anything else is broken.

[Update: I also updated the theme from (which I had not changed since 2007). The old theme would not allow for threaded commenting, which can be extremely frustrating when there are extensive comments. The new theme allows for this and a host of other things too. Now I just need to fix about a dozen small little bugs and things should be good.]

~Jura

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

3 Responses to Site update

  1. Is there any way to get in touch with you?

  2. Ah, I hadn’t realized that I didn’t really offer any real way to contact me privately. I have since fixed that. There is now a contact form at the top left of the site. That should work for contacting me offsite while hopefully keeping spam to a minimum.

    Thanks for the heads up on that.

  3. Avatar Joshua farley
    Joshua farley says:

    Well that all sounds good but what you should really do is just say that despite the fact that we think that science has all the answers it’ really is only guessing to the best of its ability. Without proper evidence one could only speculate at what it interprets the evidence to actually be. Until now and until what I can bring to the table which is the truth. Not through speculative theories but with sold evidence. How could this be possible one might say without a clear example. It can’t so that is why my claim is so important but for some reason won’t be heard by the paleontologist community. Due to my lack of education and the grandness of my claim, my find is dismissed even though it is clearly complete. It goes to show that scientific methods are narrow minded and are clearly not making experts on identifying fossils in rare and exceptionaly good condition. If you doubt my claim contact Me and I can clear up this debate on what these Russian paleontologist are looking at and surprisingly describing very accurately with a complete and clear example.