Comments on: Mechanics of bipedalism suggest dinosaurs had to be warm-blooded. Or: Why the aerobic capacity model needs to be retired. http://reptilis.net/2010/01/23/mechanics-of-bipedalism-suggest-dinosaurs-had-to-be-warm-blooded-or-why-the-aerobic-capacity-model-needs-to-be-retired/ The rants and ravings of the webmaster Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:39:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: John Hutchinson http://reptilis.net/2010/01/23/mechanics-of-bipedalism-suggest-dinosaurs-had-to-be-warm-blooded-or-why-the-aerobic-capacity-model-needs-to-be-retired/comment-page-1/#comment-2380 John Hutchinson Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:38:31 +0000 http://reptilis.net/?p=516#comment-2380 Jura kindly posted a summary of his comments/queries for us on PLoS ONE and we responded: http://2ilz.sl.pt Jura kindly posted a summary of his comments/queries for us on PLoS ONE and we responded:
http://2ilz.sl.pt

]]> By: Michael O. Erickson http://reptilis.net/2010/01/23/mechanics-of-bipedalism-suggest-dinosaurs-had-to-be-warm-blooded-or-why-the-aerobic-capacity-model-needs-to-be-retired/comment-page-1/#comment-2350 Michael O. Erickson Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:01:46 +0000 http://reptilis.net/?p=516#comment-2350 Great post. I likewise am disturbed at how the aerobic capacity hypothesis has been so widely endorsed, when it is so under-supported by data. This is why I love this blog - Jura unapologetically slays excepted dogma with a cold, hard facts. Absolutely magnificent. Great post. I likewise am disturbed at how the aerobic capacity hypothesis has been so widely endorsed, when it is so under-supported by data.

This is why I love this blog – Jura unapologetically slays excepted dogma with a cold, hard facts. Absolutely magnificent.

]]> By: Andy http://reptilis.net/2010/01/23/mechanics-of-bipedalism-suggest-dinosaurs-had-to-be-warm-blooded-or-why-the-aerobic-capacity-model-needs-to-be-retired/comment-page-1/#comment-2341 Andy Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:07:27 +0000 http://reptilis.net/?p=516#comment-2341 Excellent! Just as a heads-up, PLoS requires "real" names rather than pseudonyms for comments. If this is a problem for you, I would be more than happy to post a link on your behalf. Excellent! Just as a heads-up, PLoS requires “real” names rather than pseudonyms for comments. If this is a problem for you, I would be more than happy to post a link on your behalf.

]]> By: Jura http://reptilis.net/2010/01/23/mechanics-of-bipedalism-suggest-dinosaurs-had-to-be-warm-blooded-or-why-the-aerobic-capacity-model-needs-to-be-retired/comment-page-1/#comment-2339 Jura Mon, 25 Jan 2010 03:44:51 +0000 http://reptilis.net/?p=516#comment-2339 Thanks for the advice Andy. I agree that would be a good idea, and I think I will do that. I like PLoS ONE's open access, community oriented ideals, and would like to encourage it. Thanks for the advice Andy. I agree that would be a good idea, and I think I will do that. I like PLoS ONE’s open access, community oriented ideals, and would like to encourage it.

]]> By: Andy http://reptilis.net/2010/01/23/mechanics-of-bipedalism-suggest-dinosaurs-had-to-be-warm-blooded-or-why-the-aerobic-capacity-model-needs-to-be-retired/comment-page-1/#comment-2337 Andy Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:25:08 +0000 http://reptilis.net/?p=516#comment-2337 Well-researched post! <i>PLoS ONE</i> allows readers to add their comments, observations, and suggested corrections to the articles published there. If you are so inclined, I would recommend doing so either with your full blog post or a few selected points from above. This way your concerns with the paper will be available to a broader audience (and the authors may even respond in the same forum, as they are encouraged to do). - Andy Farke (section editor of paleontology for <i>PLoS ONE</i>. Well-researched post! PLoS ONE allows readers to add their comments, observations, and suggested corrections to the articles published there. If you are so inclined, I would recommend doing so either with your full blog post or a few selected points from above. This way your concerns with the paper will be available to a broader audience (and the authors may even respond in the same forum, as they are encouraged to do). – Andy Farke (section editor of paleontology for PLoS ONE.

]]>